W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > May 2001

Re: Another fragment issue

From: Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN <champin@bat710.univ-lyon1.fr>
Date: 18 May 2001 16:15:22 +0200
To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
Cc: RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-Id: <990195323.781.4.camel@lisiperso3>
Aaron,

I re-read TBL's Design Issues (DI) last week,
and found some interesting opinions about the fragment issue.

Some document in DI claims that there is no fundamental difference btw
URIs and URI refs.

I also read that 'fragment' must be read in a quite general meaning :
a fragment identifiers identifies in fact a "property" of the resource
(must be a property of the *representation* of the resource)

About RDF, "fragments" of an RDF document may identify virtually
anything :
   http://my.server.org/metadata.rdf#Freedom
identifies
  "the thing called Freedom in metadata.rdf"
Quite handy...

I guess it brings some answer elements,
anyway, I'm like you: this bothers me a bit.

  Pierre-Antoine
Received on Friday, 18 May 2001 10:14:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:49 GMT