- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 18:48:28 +0100
- To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
- cc: Jason Diamond <jason@injektilo.org>, RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
>>>Aaron Swartz said:
> Jason Diamond <jason@injektilo.org> wrote:
>
> > Does it mean that all unprefixed attributes will
> > "assume" the prefix of their owner element for the purposes of which
> > predicate will be used or which RDF syntactic "keyword" is desired?
>
> It is my understanding that we do not currently suggest an interpretation
> for parsers to use. However, I have queried the list on this:
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001May/0069.html
At the most recent RDF Core meeting we discussed some new words I
suggested about this issue:
1) unprefixed attributes have no meaning in RDF and must not be
used (excepting backwards-compatible accepting of rdf namespace
attributes such as about, id etc.)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001May/0035.html
and the above words were accepted. This decision was recorded in
Draft minutes of 2001-05-11 RDF Core WG teleconference
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001May/att-0060/01-2001-05-11.html#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion
Is this sufficient?
Dave
Received on Sunday, 13 May 2001 12:49:32 UTC