W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > May 2001

RE: QName Problem Isn't One

From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 06:38:01 -0400
To: "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: "Aaron Swartz" <aswartz@swartzfam.com>, "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>, "RDF Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000901c0d6e1$ca70ce30$0201a8c0@ne.mediaone.net>
Brian McBride wrote:


> I believe this is legal.  A property can have a nested Description or
typed
> node element as its value - see first option of production 6.12 and
> production 6.17 of the grammar in section 6 of M&S.

Duh! My mistake, my brain saw the "description" production and not the fact
that a typedNode is an option, also a couple of the parsers had trouble
doing this correctly though SiRPAC (as I recall) works fine.

-Jonathan
Received on Monday, 7 May 2001 06:38:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:49 GMT