W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > March 2001

Re: Again: Anonymous Resources

From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:53:02 +0000 (GMT)
To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
cc: RDF interest group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.31.0103121049330.22889-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Aaron Swartz wrote:

> Lee, what is the argument against naming every resource?
>
> If the idea of RDF is to let anyone talk about anything anywhere, then
> so-called anonymous resources should be part of this too.
>
> Giving them IDs lets others join in the party, so to speak.

Have a look at http://tribble.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/~cmjg/rdf/discuss -
there's some stuff in there aout anonymous resources. I've got an RDF
implementation that (mostly) behaves like the discussion suggests it
should.

jan

PS. Anonymous resources should definitely stay.

-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287163 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk
perl -e 's?ck?t??print:perl==pants if $_="Just Another Perl Hacker\n"'
Received on Monday, 12 March 2001 05:55:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:48 GMT