W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > March 2001

Re: Again: Anonymous Resources

From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:53:02 +0000 (GMT)
To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
cc: RDF interest group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.31.0103121049330.22889-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Aaron Swartz wrote:

> Lee, what is the argument against naming every resource?
> If the idea of RDF is to let anyone talk about anything anywhere, then
> so-called anonymous resources should be part of this too.
> Giving them IDs lets others join in the party, so to speak.

Have a look at http://tribble.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/~cmjg/rdf/discuss -
there's some stuff in there aout anonymous resources. I've got an RDF
implementation that (mostly) behaves like the discussion suggests it


PS. Anonymous resources should definitely stay.

jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287163 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk
perl -e 's?ck?t??print:perl==pants if $_="Just Another Perl Hacker\n"'
Received on Monday, 12 March 2001 05:55:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:35 UTC