W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > March 2001

Re: Again: Anonymous Resources

From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:22:54 -0600
To: Lee Jonas <lee.jonas@cakehouse.co.uk>, "'Stefan Kokkelink'" <skokkeli@mathematik.uni-osnabrueck.de>, RDF interest group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B6D12693.24C58%aswartz@swartzfam.com>

Lee, what is the argument against naming every resource?

If the idea of RDF is to let anyone talk about anything anywhere, then
so-called anonymous resources should be part of this too.

Giving them IDs lets others join in the party, so to speak.
-- 
[ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]

Received on Sunday, 11 March 2001 15:22:29 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Aaron Swartz: "Re: Spec doesn't talk about two-valued relationships"
Previous message: Seth Russell: "Re: How are statements grounded ?"
In reply to: Lee Jonas: "RE: Again: Anonymous Resources"
Next in thread: Seth Russell: "Re: Again: Anonymous Resources"
Reply: Seth Russell: "Re: Again: Anonymous Resources"
Reply: Jan Grant: "Re: Again: Anonymous Resources"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:48 GMT