W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > March 2001

RE: Again: Anonymous Resources

From: Lee Jonas <lee.jonas@cakehouse.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 17:09:42 -0000
Message-ID: <51ED29F31E20D411AAFD00105A4CD7A770BB@zingiber.cakehouse.co.uk>
To: "'Stefan Kokkelink'" <skokkeli@mathematik.uni-osnabrueck.de>, Lee Jonas <lee.jonas@cakehouse.co.uk>
Cc: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>, RDF interest group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
I see - effectively an ID at the XML syntax level (allowing serialisation of
graphs within a document) and not at the RDF model level (i.e. not an RDF
resource identifier).  Ok.

Regards

Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: Stefan Kokkelink [mailto:skokkeli@mathematik.uni-osnabrueck.de]
Sent: 08 March 2001 16:05
To: Lee Jonas
Cc: Aaron Swartz; RDF interest group
Subject: Re: Again: Anonymous Resources


Lee Jonas wrote:
...
> What would the rdf:anonymous_ID actually accomplish over rdf:ID?  If you
> give a name to something it is no longer nameless.

The interpretation is different.
An RDF parser should be allowed to *change* the name
by a one to one mapping in the first case. Of course it should not
be allowed to do this with URI's given by rdf:IDs.

For example the following 'RDF' would be
equivalent

<rdfs:Class rdf:ID="MyClass"> 
  <dc:creator>
    <rdf:Description rdf:anonymous_ID="1">
       <name>Stefan</name>
    </rdf:Description>
  </dc:creator>
</rdfs:Class>

<rdfs:Class rdf:ID="MyClass"> 
  <dc:creator>
    <rdf:Description rdf:anonymous_ID="2">
       <name>Stefan</name>
    </rdf:Description>
  </dc:creator>
</rdfs:Class>

since there is an obvious bijection ;-).


Greetings,
Stefan
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2001 12:10:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:48 GMT