W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > June 2001

RE: Practical application

From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@btinternet.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 01:47:04 +0100
To: "Murray Altheim" <altheim@eng.sun.com>, "Fernanda Hembecker" <fernanda@ppgia.pucpr.br>
Cc: "www-rdf-interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <EBEPLGMHCDOJJJPCFHEFAENCDKAA.danny.ayers@btinternet.com>
I'm sorry Murray, first impressions to me look like it's just html <meta>
tag, plus a bit of arbitrary xml. No doubt this is useful for search
engines. How are these tags interpreted in the body of a document by
browsers? I may be wrong, but Dublin Core doesn't express everything that
might be needed, and the link rel we've seen before - maybe this will be
different? Here's the bottom line - how would a harvester be any the wiser
with documents following this syntax than it would with arbitrary HTML?

---
Danny Ayers
http://www.isacat.net

>-----Original Message-----
>From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org
>[mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Murray Altheim
>Sent: 21 June 2001 19:25
>To: Fernanda Hembecker
>Cc: www-rdf-interest
>Subject: Re: Practical application
>
>
>Fernanda Hembecker wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>     Is there a public directory with practical examples of RDF? But not
>> only with RDF fragments, I would like to know how should be an html page
>> with RDF properties in it. Until now, I've seen just one example, adding
>> RDF to the <head></head> section on a HTML page and I have a doubt.
>> Netscape6 shows de label "Documents" in the expression "<rdf:value>
>> Documents </rdf:value>". Is this correct?
>
>I've been hesitant to announce this since it's not quite finished, but
>since you asked, here's a specification in the works that describes
>how to incorporate Dublin Core metadata within XHTML, so that Web pages
>can be harvested for their subject, author, etc. content. How this might
>occur is described in section 5.5.3. You'll note that this doesn't put
>RDF of any flavour into a Web page. That couldn't be validated, which
>is one of the requirements of the project, and in terms of being globally
>useful, allowing every author in the world to create their own flavour
>of metadata isn't a particularly compelling need; we all need to agree
>on using the same "carrier" with a small number of controlled
>vocabularies. Dublin Core fits this bill as a very popular way of
>capturing a subset of the kinds of metadata described in things I've
>read about the Semantic Web.
>
>There's also a section on how to work this with topic maps.
>
>Anyway, enough selling. I'd start a new thread with an announcement,
>but I'm waiting until a first round of feedback has impacted the
>head and shoulders of the spec before there's any "splash." This is
>intended to eventually be submitted as a W3C Note. I just updated
>the online version, so it should still smell fresh.
>
>  Augmented Metadata in XHTML
>  Murray Altheim, Sean Palmer, 21 June 2001 (latest version)
>  http://www.doctypes.org/meta/NOTE-xhtml-augmeta.html
>
>I think this might be a start toward practical applications, and it's
>simple to understand and implement (my prototype Java processor for this
>is tiny), doesn't invent too much (which seems the bane of our clever
>community), and works okay with existing browsers. Feedback welcome.
>
>Murray
>
>...........................................................................
>Murray Altheim                            <mailto:altheim&#x40;eng.sun.com>
>XML Technology Center
>Sun Microsystems, Inc., MS MPK17-102, 1601 Willow Rd., Menlo Park, CA 94025
>
>      In the evening
>      The rice leaves in the garden
>      Rustle in the autumn wind
>      That blows through my reed hut.  -- Minamoto no Tsunenobu
>
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2001 20:52:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:49 GMT