W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > June 2001

RE: rdfms-resource-semantics

From: dehora <bill@dehora.fsnet.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 17:46:02 +0100
To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DCEBKOHMHCKKIAAPKLLMGEPKCIAA.bill@dehora.fsnet.co.uk>
The Conceptual Graphs proposed ANSI standard offers 
adequate definitions for both 'entity' and 'referent'.

<http://www.bestweb.net/%7Esowa/cg/cgstandw.htm#Header_19>

regards,
Bill

----
Bill de hOra : InterX : bdehora@interx.com 

: -----Original Message-----
: From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org
: [mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of
: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
: Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2001 7:40 AM
: To: tshipley@symbio-tech.com; lee.jonas@cakehouse.co.uk; decoy@iki.fi
: Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
: Subject: RE: rdfms-resource-semantics
: 
: 
: 
: I like 'referant' too. It is much more precise than 'entity'
: (which is also far too overloaded).
: 
: Patrick
: 
: > -----Original Message-----
: > From: ext Trent Shipley [mailto:tshipley@symbio-tech.com]
: > Sent: 09 June, 2001 07:51
: > To: Lee Jonas; 'Sampo Syreeni'
: > Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
: > Subject: RE: rdfms-resource-semantics
: > 
: > 
: > I like it.
: > 
: > > 
: > > Yes, 'entity' is one possibility.  Off the top of my head, what 
: > > about the term 'referant' - i.e. "that which is referred to"?
: > > 
: > > regards
: > > 
: > > Lee
: > > 
: > 
: 
: 
Received on Saturday, 9 June 2001 12:46:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:49 GMT