W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > June 2001

RE: rdfms-resource-semantics

From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 09:40:11 +0300
Message-ID: <6D1A8E7871B9D211B3B00008C7490AA507958768@treis03nok>
To: tshipley@symbio-tech.com, lee.jonas@cakehouse.co.uk, decoy@iki.fi
Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org

I like 'referant' too. It is much more precise than 'entity'
(which is also far too overloaded).

Patrick

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Trent Shipley [mailto:tshipley@symbio-tech.com]
> Sent: 09 June, 2001 07:51
> To: Lee Jonas; 'Sampo Syreeni'
> Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> Subject: RE: rdfms-resource-semantics
> 
> 
> I like it.
> 
> > 
> > Yes, 'entity' is one possibility.  Off the top of my head, what 
> > about the term 'referant' - i.e. "that which is referred to"?
> > 
> > regards
> > 
> > Lee
> > 
> 
Received on Saturday, 9 June 2001 02:40:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:49 GMT