W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > June 2001

Re: What to do about namespace derived URI refs... (long)

From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 18:27:19 +0100
Message-ID: <027801c0eeae$0a208f00$60dd93c3@z5n9x1>
To: "Seth Russell" <seth@robustai.net>, <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Cc: <Ora.Lassila@nokia.com>
> But if the web page is describing an abstract entity [see
> below], and some author decides to coin the URI for
> that abstract entity to be his web page URL; then the
> RDF cannot tell the difference between descriptions of
> the abstract thing and descriptions of web page.

But then the author has assigned a URI to two different resources,
which is prohibited by the URI specification. It's either a Web Page,
or it's the concept of some abstract thing, like love or hatred, or it
represents some physical object like a brick, but not all three. Not
any more than one.

So you have http://robustai.net/seth/ and it's your homepage. Fine.
You can put it in your RDF bookmark system. Now, you want to coin some
abstract entity that is defined by a view of that resource, for
example "Truth", so you use the URI http://robustai.net/seth/#Truth or
even http://robustai.net/seth/Truth as long as the latter is never
referred to as a Web Page. Even if it is, there isn't a problem,
thanks to contextualization - someone can call it a Web Page if they
want to - it won't break any of your programs.

--
Kindest Regards,
Sean B. Palmer
@prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> .
:Sean :hasHomepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2001 13:26:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:49 GMT