W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > June 2001

Re: [topicmapmail] RDF and TopicMaps: an Exercise in Convergence

From: Piotr Kaminski <pkaminsk@who.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 13:19:49 -0700
Message-ID: <004e01c0ed34$61e2a6e0$11194518@gv.shawcable.net>
To: <topicmapmail@infoloom.com>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
[Sam Hunting]
> In a topic map, a human is the ultimate arbiter of subject identity.
> Is the same true for an RDF resource?

Opinion from the peanut gallery:  Given the RFC 2396 definition of
"resource", how could it be otherwise?  While RDF does not adopt this
definition literally (there's some issues with fragments, I believe), it
does follow its spirit.  Unless and until computers start having human
insights into abstract human concepts, how can they decide what a resource's
subject "is"?

        -- P.

  Piotr Kaminski <pkaminsk@who.net>  http://www.csr.uvic.ca/~pkaminsk
  To do:  put witty quote here.
Received on Monday, 4 June 2001 16:21:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:36 UTC