W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > February 2001

Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes?

From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 15:53:12 -0800
Message-ID: <3A8B1A67.720824C1@robustai.net>
To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
CC: Bill de hOra <bill@dehora.fsnet.co.uk>, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>, Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN <champin@bat710.univ-lyon1.fr>, RDF interest group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Aaron Swartz wrote:

>     <http://aaronsw.com/> dc:title <data:,Aaron%20Swartz>

Why would this ever be preferable to the following?

<http://aaronsw.com/> dc:title  "Aaron Swartz"

<signature
       language="SemEnglish"
       fromDictionary="http://webns.net/roughterms/#"
       context="ThisEmailTrain"
       intent="toRecieveAnswer">
Seth
     preferedEmail "seth@robustai.net";
     properName "Seth Russell";
     affiliatedWith SWAG.
Seth asks Who#x ?
Who#x
     (works well with) Seth;
     fluentIn RDF, N3, VB, "C++", SQL;
     (can easily learn) BerkeleyDB;
     salaryRequirements "0".
Sembrowser
     description "Semantic Web Browser";
     (will be like) [Moasic (was to) Www].
SemEnglish
     see [http://robustai.net/mentography/semenglish.html].
SWAG
    a (Group of People);
    acronymOf "Semantic Web Agreement Group";
    uri [http://purl.org/swag/].
</signature>
Received on Wednesday, 14 February 2001 18:45:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:48 GMT