W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > August 2001

Re: Blindfold Grammars

From: Andrei S. Lopatenko <andrei@derpi.tuwien.ac.at>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 23:27:34 +0200
Message-ID: <031301c12f3f$166f42c0$a6498280@tuwien.ac.at>
To: "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Sandro
As far as I understand from you document, semantic anotations are one of the
main aspects of your system. And it would be very good if we could have very
simple semantic engine
But from Semantic Annotation paragraph
"The main criteria in its design are (1) clarity for human authors and
readers, (2) ease of use" and  "Also (3) be somewhat isolated from possible
changes in the RDF model. A declarative style would also be nice, because
that's what we really mean, but t's neither more clear nor easier to use."
But is there any way to say that semantic of sentence is derived from
semantic  of part. I think it is neccesity to add litle reasoning
Best regards
MSc Andrei S. Lopatenko
Researcher
Vienna University of Technology
Extension Centre
http://derpi.tuwien.ac.at/~andrei/




----- Original Message -----
From: "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>
To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 10:25 PM
Subject: Blindfold Grammars


>
> I've finally written up something I've been working on recently.  I
> think it's fascinating, but it's still too experimental to claim more
> than partial victory.  The idea is to read and write almost any format
> or language as if it were RDF/XML.  The reasons for this are numerous,
> as are the technical challenges.
>
> For some details, see: http://www.w3.org/2001/06/blindfold/grammar
>
> I welcome technical feedback.
>
>     -- sandro
>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 27 August 2001 17:22:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:51 GMT