W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > April 2001

RE: ContentType negotiation

From: Sampo Syreeni <decoy@iki.fi>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:46:35 +0300 (EEST)
To: Andy Powell <a.powell@ukoln.ac.uk>
cc: RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.30.0104241444460.5594-100000@kruuna.Helsinki.FI>
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Andy Powell wrote:

>One other issue with this approach is that it makes two resources ('the
>resource' and 'the RDF about the resource') available at the same URL.

A beautiful example of this comes when you try to create a detached
signature for the RDF data. Even if you manage to sign a non-negotiated
alias, you will end up with serious trouble when people go to the site and
manage to get to the meta under the different, negotiated URI.

Sampo Syreeni, aka decoy, mailto:decoy@iki.fi, gsm: +358-50-5756111
student/math+cs/helsinki university, http://www.iki.fi/~decoy/front
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2001 07:51:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:49 GMT