W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > April 2001

RE: ContentType negotiation

From: Lee Jonas <lee.jonas@cakehouse.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 12:34:15 +0100
Message-ID: <51ED29F31E20D411AAFD00105A4CD7A7710B@zingiber.cakehouse.co.uk>
To: "'Jonathan Borden'" <jborden@mediaone.net>, Andy Powell <a.powell@ukoln.ac.uk>, RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Jonathan Borden [mailto:jborden@mediaone.net] wrote:

>Andy Powell wrote:
>> One other issue with this approach is that it makes two resources ('the
>> resource' and 'the RDF about the resource') available at the same URL.
>> Both of these are (different) resources and each may have other RDF
>> descriptions about them.  Is it a problem to make both resources
>> at the same URL or is everything OK provided that they can both also be
>> identified separately with their own URI?  Or doesn't it matter?
>Content negotiation does not change the mapping of a URI to a resource
>has nothing to do with the time-to-time resolution of a URI into a stream
>characters returned over a network.

I'm not sure I understand your point here.  Please elaborate.


Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2001 07:34:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:35 UTC