RE: ContentType negotiation

Jonathan Borden [mailto:jborden@mediaone.net] wrote:

>Andy Powell wrote:
>
>>
>> One other issue with this approach is that it makes two resources ('the
>> resource' and 'the RDF about the resource') available at the same URL.
>> Both of these are (different) resources and each may have other RDF
>> descriptions about them.  Is it a problem to make both resources
available
>> at the same URL or is everything OK provided that they can both also be
>> identified separately with their own URI?  Or doesn't it matter?
>>
>
>Content negotiation does not change the mapping of a URI to a resource
which
>has nothing to do with the time-to-time resolution of a URI into a stream
of
>characters returned over a network.
>
>-Jonathan

I'm not sure I understand your point here.  Please elaborate.

regards

Lee