W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > April 2001

RE: Vance

From: Danny Ayers <danny@panlanka.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 23:07:19 +0600
To: "Meltsner, Kenneth" <Kenneth.Meltsner@ca.com>, "Seth Russell" <seth@robustai.net>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, "Ken MacLeod" <ken@bitsko.slc.ut.us>
Message-ID: <EBEPLGMHCDOJJJPCFHEFCEANDCAA.danny@panlanka.net>
The controversy has begun!!!

BTW, Seth, as the originator of this term any definitions you come up with
will automatically be considered ill-conceived and inappropriate to the
users of the term - any historical fact you refer to regarding the term will
also be considered a refutable matter of opinion. See - you're on V. 1.1
already...

---
Danny Ayers
http://www.isacat.net

<- -----Original Message-----
<- From: Meltsner, Kenneth [mailto:Kenneth.Meltsner@ca.com]
<- Sent: 13 April 2001 23:02
<- To: Seth Russell; Danny Ayers; www-rdf-interest@w3.org; Ken MacLeod
<- Subject: RE: Vance
<-
<-
<- Oddly, I thought it was a reference to Jack Vance, a science
<- fiction noted for his tendency to use footnotes to explain
<- obscure alien and technical jargon.
<-
<- Ken Meltsner
<-
Received on Friday, 13 April 2001 13:11:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:48 GMT