Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com> wrote: >> The answers to what's the resource at a namespace URI >> (a namespace) and what's the resource at data: URI (the >> content of the URI) seem to be mutually exclusive. > Using data: URIs for namespaces (which return data) seems no > better/worse to me than using HTTP URIs, which are also designed to > return data. I think the difference is that with HTTP, the spec makes it clear that you request a _resource_ from the server and the server attempts to send back the best representation it can. So if you request a namespace, you'll get back a description of a namespace. However, with the data: URI the only resource (AFAICT) involved is the data itself. Thus, it can never be a namespace, since it will always be a chunk of text (or an image, or whatever). (Unless we come up with a MIME type for namespaces.) -- [ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]Received on Friday, 13 April 2001 12:15:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:48 GMT