W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > November 2000

Re: Statements/Reified statements

From: Jonas Liljegren <jonas@rit.se>
Date: 23 Nov 2000 09:51:18 +0100
To: Graham Klyne <GK@Dial.pipex.com>
Cc: Sergey Melnik <melnik@db.stanford.edu>, ML RDF-interest <www-rdf-interest@w3c.org>
Message-ID: <87d7fnm5q1.fsf@astral.paranormal.se>
Graham Klyne <GK@Dial.pipex.com> writes:

> I think it is necessary to distinguish between 'statings' and
> 'quotings' of statements.  Reification is a way to do that within
> the RDF model as currently defined.  Are there others?

Every statement is stated in a specific context.  The stating is true
within the context and othervise false.

One common way to implement RDF is to have a fact boolean for every
statement indicating if it's only a reified statement or the actual

But it would be better to indicate in which models/contexts the
statement is true.

This means that a quoting of a statement not considered to be true can
be done by refereing to a statement belonging to another

This means that instead of four, we have five:

{ uri, pred, subj, obj, model }

Or, just don't consider any statements true, unless they explicitly is
placed in a trusted model.

/ Jonas Liljegren

The Wraf project http://www.uxn.nu/wraf/
Sponsored by http://www.rit.se/
Received on Thursday, 23 November 2000 03:50:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:33 UTC