Re: unreification

Seth Russell wrote
> Yes, I think, if we can use an ident to uniquely identify a statement and use
> that ident as an object, then a lot of our troubles will go away.  But I doubt
> that the powers that be will consider sanctifying such a bold departure from
> M&S.  However, in passing I note that, about half of the implementations of
RDF
> listed at [1] have chosen to assign an ID to each statement.

I guess/hope you mean using the ID attribute as mentioned in RDF M&S
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/#grammar
[[[...The value of the ID attribute, if specified, is the identifier for the
   resource that represents the reification of the statement...]]]

--
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/