- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 11:27:03 +0100
- To: " - *seth@robustai.net" <seth@robustai.net>
- Cc: " - *www-rdf-interest@w3.org" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Seth Russell wrote > Yes, I think, if we can use an ident to uniquely identify a statement and use > that ident as an object, then a lot of our troubles will go away. But I doubt > that the powers that be will consider sanctifying such a bold departure from > M&S. However, in passing I note that, about half of the implementations of RDF > listed at [1] have chosen to assign an ID to each statement. I guess/hope you mean using the ID attribute as mentioned in RDF M&S http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/#grammar [[[...The value of the ID attribute, if specified, is the identifier for the resource that represents the reification of the statement...]]] -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Friday, 17 November 2000 05:27:09 UTC