W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > November 2000

Re: unreification

From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 11:27:03 +0100
To: " - *seth@robustai.net" <seth@robustai.net>
Cc: " - *www-rdf-interest@w3.org" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-Id: <0006800035209836000002L062*@MHS>
Seth Russell wrote
> Yes, I think, if we can use an ident to uniquely identify a statement and use
> that ident as an object, then a lot of our troubles will go away.  But I doubt
> that the powers that be will consider sanctifying such a bold departure from
> M&S.  However, in passing I note that, about half of the implementations of
> listed at [1] have chosen to assign an ID to each statement.

I guess/hope you mean using the ID attribute as mentioned in RDF M&S
[[[...The value of the ID attribute, if specified, is the identifier for the
   resource that represents the reification of the statement...]]]

Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Friday, 17 November 2000 05:27:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:33 UTC