W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > May 2000

RE: lightweight reification (was Representing trust (and other co ntex t) in RDF)

From: Graham Klyne <GK@dial.pipex.com>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 13:13:31 +0100
Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20000530130627.00dd7ba0@pop.dial.pipex.com>
To: "McBride, Brian" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: RDF interest group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Brian,

At 11:39 AM 5/30/00 +0100, you wrote:

>I'd argue that we have established:
>
>   o  the syntax I outlined in my previous message gives a representation
>      as compact as one would get with the digest approach
>
>   o  the processing required is not significantly different to the
>      digest approach

If I've got the right bit of syntax, the trouble I see is that I don't know 
how to represent it in a pure graph form.

I really want to resolve this at the model level, not the XML serialization 
level.  For example, reading the "Cambridge 
Communique"  <http://www.w3.org/TR/schema-arch>, recommendation 8, we can 
expect alternative serialization forms in due course.

#g
--


Is this the syntax you meant?:

<rdf:RDF>
   <description about='uri for device'>
     <foo:screensize ID='ss'  >64 32</foo:screensize>
     <foo:colours    ID='clrs'>2</foo:colours>
   </description>
   <description about='#ss'      foo:context='#context'/>
   <description about='#clrs'    foo:context='#context'/>
   <description about='#context' foo:assertedBy='Brian'/>
</rdf:RDF>

------------
Graham Klyne
(GK@ACM.ORG)
Received on Tuesday, 30 May 2000 09:28:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:43 GMT