W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > May 2000

Is the term 'anonymous resourse' a misnomer?

From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
Date: Thu, 04 May 2000 10:48:38 -0700
Message-ID: <3911B7F5.589D2121@robustai.net>
To: RDF SIG <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Is it just me, or is the term 'anomious resource' a misnomer?  Isn't
this thing a subjective reference like an indexical or a local
variable that has meaning locally (subjectively) but not globally
(objectively)?   If this interpretation is correct, then how did we
get stuck with the term 'anonymous'?

Seth Russell
Received on Friday, 5 May 2000 13:37:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:29 UTC