W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > March 2000

Re: Acyclic RDF Graph???

From: Perry A. Caro <caro@Adobe.COM>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 12:24:53 -0800
Message-ID: <38DA7D95.7E99CDA3@corp.adobe.com>
To: RDF-list <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
I hope that cycles are discouraged, rather than encouraged.  I agree that
the specification allows them (the RDFMS says "directed labeled graph", not
"directed labeled acyclic graph"), but I'm not sure it should be recommended
best practice.  All of us poor implementors trying to persist our models in
RDBMS and similar cycle unfriendly systems have to deal with cycles, but the
assumption I've been making is that cycles will be uncommon.  It's hard to
optimize lookups otherwise.

Received on Thursday, 23 March 2000 15:27:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:29 UTC