W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > July 2000

Re: Inference rules [was: extracting...]

From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 18:16:54 +0200
To: " - *connolly@w3.org" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: " - *www-rdf-interest@w3.org" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-Id: <0006800028422458000002L082*@MHS>
> On 17 July 2000 jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com wrote:
> > Dan Connolly wrote:
> > Ah... thanks. I have glanced at that syntax a few
> > times without understanding. Now I get it. Er...
> > no, I don't: that's not legal RDF syntax, is it?
> > the junction propertyNode can only have one child
> > element, right?

> I'm also not sure I understand what you mean.
> The junction is a class name and not a property.

Sorry, I was wrong: junction was indeed a propertyElt and
a propertyElt can only have one typedNode [6.12->6.17->6.3].
I didn't realize that untill I used SiRPAC (Sergey's RDF-API
was not complaining).
We got rid of junction and are using several propertyElt's
instead (if, and-if, if-not, and-if-not).

--
Jos De Roo
Received on Monday, 31 July 2000 12:18:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:43 GMT