W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > January 2000

RE: URI equivalence, URI's for "standard" identifiers

From: Ron Daniel <RDaniel@DATAFUSION.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 07:57:47 -0800
Message-ID: <0D611E39F997D0119F9100A0C931315C6100D2@datafusionnt1>
To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Cc: Eric Hellman <eric@openly.com>, RDF Interest Group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Charles McCathieNevile said:

> But does the ISO have a trademark on the term "ISO 9000" that means they
> can
> stop people from using the term to refer to something that meets ISO9000
> (whatever that is)?
> 
> Surely not. And it is a simple matter to create a scheme for expressing
> that
> something cvlaims to meet ISO9000 - in fact I have done something like
> this
> for asserting that something meets WAI guidelines. All you need is a URI
> for
> "so,mething" and a URI for ISO9000...
> 
[Ron Daniel]  It was the bit about "a URI for ISO9000" that
I was talking about. I'm just saying that organizations
like ISO that are actually responsible for those standards
are the ones who should assign URIs for them. We might as
a group come up with some interim URIs, then later declare
them as synonyms for the real URIs, but we can't assign the
real URIs for schemes like ISBN, UPC, ISSN, etc.

Regards,
Ron
>  
Received on Monday, 24 January 2000 10:57:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:42 GMT