W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > February 2000

Re: A certain difficulty

From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Date: 25 Feb 2000 06:27:21 -0500
To: xml-dev@xml.org, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Message-ID: <m3d7plfrom.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
Len Bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net> writes:

> RDF: why?

To exchange serialized objects independent of protocols or programming
language (forget about the semantic web hooey).  RDF is suboptimal for
this, but it gets a lot of things right (i.e. extensibility) and there
doesn't seem to be another reasonable candidate out there yet.  On the 
other hand, the RDF-Syntax spec is scaring people away in droves, so
it's hard to know what to do.

There's a lot of money in this: e-commerce requires much richer data
nowadays, and retailers want that data to flow from wholesalers and
wholesalers want that data to flow from producers.  If you take a look
at data-exchange right now (tab-delimited dumps, product-specific
tables, etc.) it's a bit of a bad joke.  Writing specific XML formats
for each exchange task is a small improvement, but you miss out on the
network effect of being able to share 90% of the processing software,
because the XML data model is too low-level.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@megginson.com
           http://www.megginson.com/
Received on Friday, 25 February 2000 06:28:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:42 GMT