W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > December 2000

Is <Description> redundant?

From: Graham Klyne <GK@Dial.pipex.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 12:10:32 +0000
Message-Id: <>
To: RDF interest group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
I has occurred to me that the "third basic abbreviation" form for RDF in 
XML, coupled with the RDF schema definition of rdfs:Resource, renders the 
<rdf:Description> element of RDF redundant.

Noting that any RDF resource is an instance of rdfs:Resource, it occurs to 
me that _any_ <rdf:Description> element can be equivalently described as:

       (content of description)

One is not prevented from placing <rdf:type> arcs in the description:  this 
must be allowed anyway to describe instances of multiple classes.

Graham Klyne
Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2000 08:58:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:33 UTC