Graham Klyne wrote: > > I has occurred to me that the "third basic abbreviation" form for RDF in > XML, coupled with the RDF schema definition of rdfs:Resource, renders the > <rdf:Description> element of RDF redundant. One remaining question. M&S states that a container is implicitly associated with a Description (see between figures 8 and 9). Is this also true for a typedNode? If without a bagID? Jonathan Borden The Open Healthcare Group http://www.openhealth.orgReceived on Wednesday, 20 December 2000 22:40:11 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:19:45 GMT