yasq (yet another syntax question)

Hi,

what's the difference between 

1.
<Description>
  <dc:creator rdf:ID="XXX">
    <Description>
      <myns:name>karl</mynsname>
    </Description>
  </dc:creator>
</Description>

and

2.
<Description>
  <dc:creator rdf:ID="10" myns:name="karl"/>
</Description>

The first case is rather clear:
M&S,[6.12, propertyElt]: 'The value of the
ID Attribute, if specified, is the identifier for the 
resource that represents the reification of the statement.'
Ok, the triples:

(genid0,dc:creator,genid1)
(genid1,myns:name,'karl')
(XXX,rdf:type,rdf:Statement)
(XXX,rdf:subject,genid0)
(XXX,rdf:predicate,dc:creator)
(XXX,rdf:object,genid1)

Let's take a look at the second example.
The spec says:

'Properties and values expressed in XML attribute form 
within an empty XML element E by productions [6.10] and 
[6.12] are equivalent to the same properties and values 
expressed as XML content of a single Description element 
D which would become the content of E. The referent of D
is the value of the property identified by the XML element 
name of E according to productions [6.17], [6.2], and 
[6.3]. Specifically; each propertyElt start tag containing 
attribute specifications other than ID, resource, bagID, 
xml:lang, or any attribute starting with the characters xmlns
results in the creation of the triples {p,r1,r2}, {pa1,r2,va1}
, ..., {pan,r2,van} where

  1.p is the expansion of the namespace-qualified tag name. 
  2.r1 is the resource being referred to by the element 
    containing this propertyElt expression. 
  3.r2 is the resource named by the resource attribute if
    present or a new resource. If the ID attribute is given
                               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    it is the identifier of this new resource. 
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  4.pa1 ... pan are the expansion of the namespace-qualified attribute
names. 
  5.va1 ... van are the corresponding attribute values.'

Thus the triples are:

(genid0,dc:creator,XXX)
(XXX,myns:name,'karl')

The interpretation of the attribute 'rdf:ID="XXX"' is totally 
different in the second example!!!!

Is this correct? If it is, is there any parser available 
that does the right job?

Greetings,
Stefan