--On 17/11/99 4:30 PM +0200 Ora.Lassila@nokia.com wrote: > Stefan, > > you raise a very interesting question. As I recall, it was actually at one > time discussed in the RDF working group. And I remeber it like it was yesterday ;-) I unsuccessfully argued for a facility in RDF syntax to differentiate between a URI being used to *identify* another resource (which we have now with "resource=" attribute) and a URI that is a link to more RDF that _could_ be dereferenced (with a new attribute "metadata="). For W3C Memebers you review the thread starting at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-rdf-syntax-wg/1998Dec/0007.html I still think that this is a _useful_ facility for the "Semantic Web" Cheers... Renato _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Dr Renato Iannella -> http://purl.net/net/renato Principal Research Scientist -> http://www.dstc.edu.au/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .....Computers Only Know Two Things.....Received on Wednesday, 17 November 1999 19:57:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:19:37 GMT