W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-dspace@w3.org > December 2003

Re: ungetable http URIs

From: Stefano Mazzocchi <stefano@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 19:17:45 +0100
Message-Id: <A958DE86-242A-11D8-9AA1-000393D2CB02@apache.org>
To: SIMILE public list <www-rdf-dspace@w3.org>

On 1 Dec 2003, at 18:16, Nick Matsakis wrote:

> On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>> If I got to vote, I would vote +1 for "getable" URIs because I think
>> that they don't add complexity, they are consistent with the general
>> XML movement, and they are potentially more valuable in the future.
> If I got to vote, I would say 'getable' URIs should be assigned to 
> things
> that can be expressed as bits, or things that are elements of RDF 
> schemas
> (e.g. if you come across something with an RDF type you don't 
> recognize,
> it would be nice if there was a schema saying something that type at a
> conveniently retrivable URL).

Fair enough.

> I think things that don't meet those requirements should get ungetable
> URIs.

What kind of URIs wouldn't meet those requirements, IMO? [not caustic, 
just curious]


Received on Monday, 1 December 2003 13:16:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:13:09 UTC