- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:11:21 +0100
- To: Arjohn Kampman <arjohn.kampman@aduna.biz>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:11:08 +0200, Arjohn Kampman <arjohn.kampman@aduna.biz> wrote:
> Dan Brickley wrote:
> > * Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org> [2005-04-05 13:50-0400]
> >
> >>>http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/process.html#rec-modify
> >
> >
> > FWIW I've added a link to that, and to www-rdf-comments, to the errata page,
> > also noting that the WG has closed.
>
> Dan,
>
> Could you also add an additional note about a likely error in the RELAX
> NG grammar (section A.1)? The literalPropertyElt production in this
> grammar reads:
>
> literalPropertyElt =
> element * - ( local:* | rdf:RDF | rdf:ID | rdf:about | rdf:parseType |
> rdf:resource | rdf:nodeID | rdf:datatype |
> rdf:Description | rdf:aboutEach | rdf:aboutEachPrefix |
> rdf:bagID | xml:* ) {
> (idAttr | datatypeAttr )?, xmllang?, xmlbase?, text
> }
>
> This production only allows either an rdf:ID attribute or an
> rdf:datatype attribute to be specified, but not both. This is different
> from the normative grammar in chapter 7. The result of following this
> grammar would be that triples with a datatyped literal as object cannot
> be reified in the normal way.
Uhoh.
> The corrected production reads:
>
> literalPropertyElt =
> element * - ( local:* | rdf:RDF | rdf:ID | rdf:about | rdf:parseType |
> rdf:resource | rdf:nodeID | rdf:datatype |
> rdf:Description | rdf:aboutEach | rdf:aboutEachPrefix |
> rdf:bagID | xml:* ) {
> idAttr?, datatypeAttr?, xmllang?, xmlbase?, text
> }
>
> Any editors or former WG-members that can acknowledge this error too?
Well, IMHO using reification at all is a modelling error :)
However your final correction looks ok to me to make the RELAXNG match
the normative grammar for literalPropertyElt.
Dave
Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2005 09:13:14 UTC