Re: W3C specification error

At 15:25 29/11/04 -0500, Dan Brickley wrote:
>Yep. I wish we'd given a name to the class of non-Literal resources.

But that's just the same as rdf:Resource, isn't it?

I.e., anything that can be denoted by a literal can also be denoted by a 
non-literal.

#g


------------
Graham Klyne
For email:
http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact