Re: W3C specification error

* Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org> [2004-11-30 08:56+0000]
> At 15:25 29/11/04 -0500, Dan Brickley wrote:
> >Yep. I wish we'd given a name to the class of non-Literal resources.
> 
> But that's just the same as rdf:Resource, isn't it?
> 
> I.e., anything that can be denoted by a literal can also be denoted by a 
> non-literal.

I think the problem is that we allowed rdfs:Resource to cover literals.

It worries me how quickly my memory of the details have faded, though :(

Dan