W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > October to December 2003

Re: Conformance model of RDF specs?

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 10:10:10 +0000
Message-ID: <3FC71F02.2070208@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org



Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> 
> Sorry for butting in ...
> 
Not at all - I misread the question - thanks for straigtening things out.

Brian

> 
>>e.g., is a RDF/XML parser required to be a validating XML parser?
> 
> 
> No, it is not. This causes some known issues when a validating XML parser and 
> a non-validating XML parser may give different RDF graphs. (e.g. because XML 
> validation adds a default attribute which then maps to a triple)
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>  Is
>>there a minimal list of encodings that an RDF/XML parser should support?
> 
> 
> UTF-8 and UTF-16 I think is what is specified by XML, RDF does not add to 
> these.
> 
> Jeremy
Received on Friday, 28 November 2003 05:11:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:33 GMT