Re: Conformance model of RDF specs?

Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> 
> Sorry for butting in ...
> 
Not at all - I misread the question - thanks for straigtening things out.

Brian

> 
>>e.g., is a RDF/XML parser required to be a validating XML parser?
> 
> 
> No, it is not. This causes some known issues when a validating XML parser and 
> a non-validating XML parser may give different RDF graphs. (e.g. because XML 
> validation adds a default attribute which then maps to a triple)
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>  Is
>>there a minimal list of encodings that an RDF/XML parser should support?
> 
> 
> UTF-8 and UTF-16 I think is what is specified by XML, RDF does not add to 
> these.
> 
> Jeremy