W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > October to December 2003

[Fwd: Re: XML Core WG review of RDF drafts]

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 17:24:57 +0000
Message-ID: <3FC63369.8040407@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: www-rdf-comments <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: XML Core WG review of RDF drafts
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 08:26:03 -0600
From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
CC: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, Eric Miller <em@w3.org>,        XML 
Core WG <w3c-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
References: <878ym4fb7n.fsf@nwalsh.com> 
<4.3.2.7.2.20030930125636.0253a790@172.27.10.30> <878ym4fb7n.fsf@nwalsh.com>

As Norm's co-chair--and because I know he's off email for a
few day--I'll answer:  yes, Norm's comments represent the XML Core WG
review, and they were meant to be posted to the public list.

Please forward them.

thanks,

paul

At 14:12 2003 11 27 +0000, Brian McBride wrote:

>Norm,
>
>Thanks for this comment.
>
>Would it be ok to forward this to RDF comments, which is a public list?
>
>Brian
>
>
>Norman Walsh wrote:
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>Hash: SHA1
>>My apologies for not sending this note sooner.
>>  The XML Core WG has reviewed the RDF/XML draft and finds no issues to
>>  raise. We observe that the RDF/XML use of xml:lang is different than
>>  might be expected by an application unaware of the special semantics
>>  of RDF. However, the XML Recommendation only describes the meaning of
>>  xml:lang as an "intent", so we accept that application-specific
>>  semantics are allowed. And such semantics seem necessary to correctly
>>  capture the RDF object model in an XML serialization.
>>                                        Be seeing you,
>>                                          norm
>>- -- 
>>Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
>>NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
>>recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
>>Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
>>If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
>>reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
>>Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
>>iD8DBQE/w7p8OyltUcwYWjsRAjREAJ9obNXFVQz8ljzL+wYy91jMtzUIYQCgnkBr
>>lXacFG40/uj+3pAqV0H/8I0=
>>=XXUC
>>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 27 November 2003 12:28:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:33 GMT