proposed closure of pfps-06 typed XML literals and LV

Peter,

This message concerns your last call comment on the RDF semantics 
document we have labelled pfps-06 [1]

The RDFCore WG had previously indicated [2] that it was accepting this 
comment, but, as you pointed out [3] there remained errors in the documents.

In your message [4] you indicated that had not heard further from the 
WG.  I understand that these errors have now be corrected and that the 
current editors drafts of concepts [5] and semantics [6] should now 
correctly address your comment.

I would be grateful if you would reply, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org 
indicating whether your comment has been acceptably addressed.

Brian


[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-06

[2] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0044.html

[3] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0051.html

[4] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0354.html

[5] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-concepts-20030117/

[6] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/

Received on Wednesday, 1 October 2003 05:01:14 UTC