W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > July to September 2003

Re: proposed closuer of pfps-02, pfps-03 [

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:16:03 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20030930.161603.46622321.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Subject: proposed closuer of pfps-02, pfps-03 [[was Re: comments on 26 September version of RDF Semantics document]]
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 14:29:40 +0100

> Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > 
> > 2/ The removal of the translation to LBase is a major improvement.  I would
> > have prefered different wording in Section 0.1 concerning this translation
> > but can live with the new situation.
> 
> Peter,
> 
> That is good news.
> 
> For the record:
> 
> Concerning the last call comments you made on the RDF Semantics document:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-02
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-03
> 
> which concerned the translation to LBase, the RDFCore WG has decided to 
> accept you comment and resolved
> 
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0267.html
> 
> to replace the lbase appendix with a suitably worded reference to an 
> updated LBase note.
> 
> Pat has since drafted the reference which you have reviewed in
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/
> 
> Can I take it from your above comment that this resolution of these 
> comments is acceptable to you.

D'accord.

> Brian

peter
Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2003 16:18:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:32 GMT