Re: [closed] Issue horrocks-01 rdfs:comment semantics

Dan,

This decision is acceptable to me.

Ian

On July 31, Dan Brickley writes:
> re http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003AprJun/0156.html
> 
> > I would like to be considered a co-submitter of comment #danc-04 and
> > informed about its resolution.
> 
> Ian,
> 
> Sorry I should have copied you on my mail of 2 minutes ago, informing
> Dan Connolly of the RDF Core WG's decision not to accept the danc-04 
> proposal for an rdfs:triviallyTrue predicate, postponing it as a 
> future possible work item. That message is at 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0137.html
> 
> Our LC issue list records you as co-submitted of danc-04. 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#schema
> 
> Could you please indicate by replying to this message,
> copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org, whether this reponse (including 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0137.html 
> which I should have copied you on) is satisfactory.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dan