W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > July to September 2003

Re: What is RDF Schema? [proposed closed]

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 09:53:16 -0400
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <20030801135316.GO18215@w3.org>

* Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> [2003-08-01 09:42-0400]
> Looks good.
> I notice however, that the first sentence of Appendix A is incorrect.  The
> description is really an RDFS description.  I do not believe that there is
> an ``RDF Core vocabulary'' and if there were, this would not be it.

currently we have:
"An RDF description of the RDF Core vocabulary is given here in RDF/XML
serialization syntax."

I'd accept that "An RDFS description of ..." would be more appropriate.

Then the question of what we're describing. Currently we _do_ describe
both the RDF namespaces owned/managed by RDF Core, ie. 
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema# but also the older 
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# so our RDF/XML appendix 
includes claims such as:

<rdfs:comment>The class of RDF properties.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Resource"/>

I believe it is useful to present an integrated RDFS description of both 
sets of classes and properties, since people can never remember which 
lives where, and the rest of the RDFS spec also describes both.

So question is how to describe this in Appendix A. How about this:

"An RDF description of the RDF Core vocabulary is given here in RDF/XML
serialization syntax."
"An RDFS description of the http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
and http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema# vocabularies is given here in 
RDF/XML syntax."

Kinda ugly, but perhaps less contentious?

Received on Friday, 1 August 2003 09:53:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:15:21 UTC