>Dear Pat, > >Thank you for your email. > >[...] > >> I would be grateful, since time is pressing, if you could respond >> directly to the question whether the WG response referred to earlier >> is an adequate one to your previous comment. > >Along this thread of discussion, we both understand that we don't >share the same opinion on some >issues. I think I have made my points quite clear. Considering the >timescale of the WG, I won't >raise objection to the WG response. But again, I would be happy if >the WG could somehow inform the >users, who choose to use the non-layering style of RDFS, of the >problems I mentioned in the >comments. Thanks, Jeff. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayesReceived on Tuesday, 29 July 2003 21:55:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:32 GMT