It is the case that according to rdfs3 rdf:type rdfs:range rdfs:Class. :x rdf:type :y. => :y rdf:type rdfs:Class. -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/ "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org <pfps@research.bell-l cc: abs.com> Subject: status of rdfs:Class Sent by: www-rdf-comments-requ est@w3.org 2003-06-18 09:21 PM I had always thought that x rdf:type y . rdfs-entailed y rdf:type rdfs:Class . but I am having problems getting this entailment to go through. So, is this supposed to be an entailment? Peter F. Patel-Schneider Bell Labs Research Lucent TechnologiesReceived on Wednesday, 18 June 2003 18:10:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 18:22:17 GMT