W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > April to June 2003

status of rdfs:Class

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 15:21:37 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20030618.152137.93392232.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org


I had always thought that 
	x rdf:type y .
rdfs-entailed
	y rdf:type rdfs:Class .
but I am having problems getting this entailment to go through.

So, is this supposed to be an entailment?  

Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Bell Labs Research
Lucent Technologies

Received on Wednesday, 18 June 2003 15:21:47 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "possible peculiarity with empty datatypes"
Previous message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: [closed] Re: pfps-25 schema semantics"
Next in thread: Jos De_Roo: "Re: status of rdfs:Class"
Maybe reply: Jos De_Roo: "Re: status of rdfs:Class"
Reply: Graham Klyne: "Re: status of rdfs:Class"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 18:22:17 GMT