W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > April to June 2003

Re: question about http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:48:43 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20030616.104843.71549825.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk

From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: question about http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:43:11 +0100

> On Thu, 22 May 2003 11:05:06 -0400
> "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > It appears to me that 
> > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf 
> > should be allowable.  In particular the claim is that rdf:bagID and 
> > rdf:resource are not both allowed on property elements.  However, 
> > production 7.2.21 appears to allow both rdf:bagID and rdf:resource in 
> > empty property elements.
> 
> rdf:bagID has, subsequent to the last public WD, been removed from the
> RDF/XML language.  

Good.

> Consquently both that production in the syntax WD
> will be removed and that test case will be made into an error. 
> 
> Dave

Will the be a list of post-last call changes?

peter
Received on Monday, 16 June 2003 10:48:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:32 GMT