W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > April to June 2003

Re: question about http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf

From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:43:11 +0100
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Message-Id: <20030616154311.3532d8b7.dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>

On Thu, 22 May 2003 11:05:06 -0400
"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote:

> It appears to me that 
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf 
> should be allowable.  In particular the claim is that rdf:bagID and 
> rdf:resource are not both allowed on property elements.  However, 
> production 7.2.21 appears to allow both rdf:bagID and rdf:resource in 
> empty property elements.

rdf:bagID has, subsequent to the last public WD, been removed from the
RDF/XML language.  Consquently both that production in the syntax WD
will be removed and that test case will be made into an error. 

Received on Monday, 16 June 2003 10:44:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:15:20 UTC