W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > April to June 2003

Re: question about http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf

From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:43:11 +0100
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Message-Id: <20030616154311.3532d8b7.dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>

On Thu, 22 May 2003 11:05:06 -0400
"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote:

> 
> It appears to me that 
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf 
> should be allowable.  In particular the claim is that rdf:bagID and 
> rdf:resource are not both allowed on property elements.  However, 
> production 7.2.21 appears to allow both rdf:bagID and rdf:resource in 
> empty property elements.

rdf:bagID has, subsequent to the last public WD, been removed from the
RDF/XML language.  Consquently both that production in the syntax WD
will be removed and that test case will be made into an error. 

Dave
Received on Monday, 16 June 2003 10:44:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:32 GMT