W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > April to June 2003

Re: Last Call comments on "Concepts and Abstract Syntax"

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 10:07:10 +0300
To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <200304091006.52500.jjc@hpl.hp.com>


Stuart,

SubTopic: Informative/Normative

I made a small mistake ... :(

In:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0329.html
[[
Stuart:
> 9) Section 7 Fragment Identifiers.
> 
> This section (and many others) is not explicitly labelled as normative or
> informative (both deginations are used elsewhere). I assume this is an
> informative section, but I think it would be helpful to be explicit in this
> case rather than leave any doubt.
Jeremy:
I believe we intended it as informative.
Accepted.
]]

We have deleted the last occurrance of the word "informative" in a section 
heading with the resolution of the social meaning issue. The other occurrence 
of the word informative is in section 1

http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-concepts-20030123/#section-Introduction

The sentence being:
[[
Within this document, normative sections are explicitly labelled as such. 
Explicit notes are informative.
]]

I hope that that sentence adequately addresses this concern, and no change is 
necessary.
Please reply if this is OK.

Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 9 April 2003 04:06:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:32 GMT