W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > October to December 2002

Re: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:47:55 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20021122104332.02a76ec0@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: phayes@ai.uwf.edu, www-rdf-comments@w3.org

At 23:53 21/11/2002 +0000, Jeremy Carroll wrote:

>Peter,
>
>I believe I have now understood your concerns on equality ...
>
>Would the following text near the beginning of the abstract syntax section 
>help (help enough to reduce it to a minor concern?)
>[[
>Note: Syntactic equality, between RDF graphs, URI references or literals, 
>is often inappropriate for applications. Semantic notions, defined in 
>[RDF-SEMANTICS], such as that of entailment between graphs, or that of 
>having the same denotation are usually preferable.
>]]

I'm concerned that this text is a little formidable for the intended 
audience of the concepts doc.

I don't understand what it is trying to say.  Please remember that the 
intended audience of the concepts doc includes folks who are not 
mathematicians.  Please make the text accessible to them.

Brian
Received on Friday, 22 November 2002 05:46:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:31 GMT