- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:47:55 +0000
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: phayes@ai.uwf.edu, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
At 23:53 21/11/2002 +0000, Jeremy Carroll wrote: >Peter, > >I believe I have now understood your concerns on equality ... > >Would the following text near the beginning of the abstract syntax section >help (help enough to reduce it to a minor concern?) >[[ >Note: Syntactic equality, between RDF graphs, URI references or literals, >is often inappropriate for applications. Semantic notions, defined in >[RDF-SEMANTICS], such as that of entailment between graphs, or that of >having the same denotation are usually preferable. >]] I'm concerned that this text is a little formidable for the intended audience of the concepts doc. I don't understand what it is trying to say. Please remember that the intended audience of the concepts doc includes folks who are not mathematicians. Please make the text accessible to them. Brian
Received on Friday, 22 November 2002 05:46:29 UTC