Re: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 18:10:22 +0000 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20021121180954.07b387f8@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com> To: fmanola@mitre.org, www-rdf-comments@w3.org · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 18:22:15 GMT

At 12:45 21/11/2002 -0500, Frank Manola wrote:

[...]

> >
> > >Again, though, if this document is for a general audience, then you 
> may want
> > >to consider use of certain terms such as entailment. You give an example,
> > >and you talk about it, but you don't define it.
> >
> > Good input.  Frank?
>
>I need some clarification here.  I thought that "this document" referred
>to RDF Semantics.  So am I being invited to define and describe
>entailment in the *Primer*?  Pat?  (NB: The Primer does currently
>mention "entailment" in Section 7.2, but that's because the Test Cases
>document has a category of test cases called "entailment tests").

I'm confused.  Sorry.

Brian