W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > October to December 2002

Re: Errors in RDF Test Cases of 12 Nov 2002(?)

From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:12:08 +0000 (GMT)
To: arjohn.kampman@aidministrator.nl
cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0211191604250.12073-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Arjohn Kampman wrote:

>
>
> While testing Sesame's RDF parser on the files in approved_20021112.zip,
> I found a number of differences between the output of the parser and the
> output that is suggested by the latest approved RDF Test Cases (12 Nov
> 2002). I think these differences are the result of the changes in the
> specification, which make a number of test cases obsolete. Can someone
> verify the correctness of the following test case files?
>
> * rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/test0007.rdf
>
>    rdf:aboutEach has been removed from the language. This test
>    file should generate an error and not the triples from
>    test0007.nt.
>
> * rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test004.nt,
>    rdfms-empty-property-elements/test003.nt, and
>    rdfms-empty-property-elements/test009.nt
>
>    N-Triples notation of XML literals has changed. 'xml' prefix
>    should be replaced with rdfs:XMLLiteral datatype, e.g.
>        xml"2"
>    should be
>        "2"^^<http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#XMLLiteral>

Arjohn, thanks! I've got a "todo" file sitting on my desktop with
these files marked out for attention. However, you should note that
XMLLiteral, after some lengthy deliberation, has been omved into the rdf
namespace (as of last Friday's telecon decision).

> * rdfms-rdf-names-use/test-013.rdf
>
>    rdf:Description is not (or no longer) allowed as a property
>    element. This test file should generate an error.
>
> * rdfms-rdf-names-use/test-025.nt
>
>    'li' should have been replaced with '_1'.
>
> * rdfms-rdf-names-use/test-026.rdf
>
>    rdf:Description is not (or no longer) allowed as an attribute
>    name. This test file should generate an error.

The rdfms-rdf-names-use test cases are due an overhaul. Thanks again,
Arjohn. I'm looking to get a fully updated set of test cases described
by manifest files over the next week or two.

-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/
perl -e 's?ck?t??print:perl==pants if $_="Just Another Perl Hacker\n"'
Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2002 11:12:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:31 GMT