W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > July to September 2002

Re: "Including" other RDF and RDFS files

From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 21:10:14 -0500
Message-Id: <p05111b02b9bc109f07e2@[65.217.30.172]>
To: mbatsis@netsmart.gr
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org

>On Saturday 28 September 2002 04:46, Brian McBride wrote:
>>  At 20:26 09/09/2002 -0700, Graham Wideman wrote:
>>
>>  [...]
>>
>>  >Is there, for example, some convention whereby a block of RDF can say
>>  >"This block of RDF abides by the RDFS schema to be found here", in the
>>  >same fashion that an ordinary XML file can specify a DTD by which it
>>  > abides?
>>
>>  Graham,
>>
>>  Have a look at isDefinedBy and seeAlso and see if they meet your needs.
>
>AFAIK the above properties are mostly for human consumption, although the
>first one implies some authority.
>
>It would be grate if we had a property with consistent meaning, as in "this
>resource completes the graph, providing metadata about the subject".

The trouble with this is that there is no such thing as 'completing' 
a graph. The aim of RDF is to provide a notation in which information 
from many sources can be combined together, so the 'closed-world' 
kind of picture where graphs have boundaries defined by other graphs 
really does not fit very well.

Pat Hayes
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola              			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501           				(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ai.uwf.edu	          http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Saturday, 28 September 2002 22:10:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:30 GMT