Re: RDF Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr

At 13:03 12/03/2002 +0100, Stefan Kokkelink wrote:
>Hi,
>
>just curious: can I conclude from the proposed solution
>that rdf:id now *always* has the semantic of reification
>on property elements?

That is the idea.

>If so, what about
>
><foo:a rdf:id="reifyWhat?" foo:b="b" foo:c="c"/>

It reifies the statement from the subject to the implied bnode.


>Or is this not legal anymore?
>
>Note: I just started to look through the archive
>after some time of absence, so this may be
>a silly question :-)

Not silly at all.

Brian